Advanced Search
This Is A Bus
Same as catalog #520337 This Is A Bus ??? The hover-bus (running on a cushion of air) grows up as a 76 passenger bus, and is unveiled in England. It's designed for quick water communication in the British Isles. Passengers entering "Westland" hover bus, walking up stairs. CU propeller? Interior of craft, passengers seated. WS hover bus skimming water. Interior, driver at controls.
Sports: Four Men Crack 4 Minute Mile
Same as catalog #520338 Sports: Four Men Crack 4 Minute Mile It's the race of the decade at Walnut, California, in the AAU games. Pan crowded stadium. In the mile run the first four men hit the wire under four minutes, runner pulls a leg muscle. A short time ago the 4 minute mile was thought impossible. Runner falls upon reaching finish line. blooper, funny, falls.
Pray At Home: Kennedy Answer to Court Ruling
Pray At Home: Kennedy Answer to Court Ruling In a six to one decision, the Supreme Court rules that school children may not recite a prayer in New York classrooms as it violates Constitutional guarantees of the separation of Church and State. At his news conference, President Kennedy urges everyone to pray more at home and attend Church more often. Reporters seated in auditorium. CU President Kennedy speaking: "It is important for us, if we are going to maintain our constitutional principle, that we support Supreme Court decisions, even when we may not agree with them. In addition, we have in this case a very easy remedy, and that is to pray, ourselves." President Kennedy continues comments.
"Shoes" For Walking On Water
"Shoes" For Walking On Water Pentagon officials witness a demonstration of foam "water shoes" that would enable soldiers to cross streams too deep to wade. Soldiers carrying machine guns, wearing water shoes, demonstrate. Women in bathing suits, try out the water shoes and dance a twist while crossing a lake. Military, inventions, funny, wacky, unusual.
August 4, 1994 - Part 10
(19:42:15)(tape #10095 begins) The CHAIRMAN. I'm going to make a point here. I want to into the record, so there's no further confusion about it, what the procedure was that was available for correcting testimony in a dep- 425 osition because this was the format that we followed, and I'm just going to read it verbatim into the record. "The deposition after it's prepared will be kept Committee confidential. However, if your attorney wants to review it or you want to review it, you can make arrangements, and we spell out how to do that and for you to read it." I'm dropping down, "it may be reviewed," and tells the time in which it is generally available for doing that and it says-it makes it very clear that it can be reviewed by the person giving the deposition or the attorney. Then it says "with respect to changes, there will be a jurat page supplied to you to make corrections, so if you find a mistake in the review, you put it on that page. Your attorney can explain a jurat page. That will allow you to make changes, for instance, if a person's name is used and it's misspelled. That can be changed. Minor corrections in transcription if there's some grammatical change you wish to make. "However, I will tell you if there are changes made in the substance of an answer, for example, a yes changing to a no, that may require you to be brought back in and redeposed and I want to make you aware of that. It should not deter you, however, from making changes. Since some Counsel believe they can make changes in the depositions themselves, we have clarified if changes are made on the jurat page, they are to be made by the witness and not by the Counsel." That was the instruction that was given. That's the ground rule that we followed. I just want to put that into the record so that it's clear that there was that opportunity for review, that is the normal practice in which it's done, and I take it that that's the instruction that you all received at the time, and that there's really no dispute about that part of the procedure. Would that be fair? Mr. ICKES. There's no dispute about that, Mr. Chairman. The CHAIRMAN. Very good. Senator Domenici. Senator DOMENICI. Senator Dodd, with reference to the note taking, could I refer you to page 87 of the deposition of Mr. Ickes? Senator DODD. I'm going to have to get that. Senator DOMENICI. Let me read it for you. "Question: Did individuals take notes" Senator DODD. Where are you on the page, Pete? Senator DOMENICI. Page 87, second line. Question: Did individuals take notes at those meetings, if you noticed? Answer: Some individuals did. Question, Did you take notes? [Witness conferred with counsel.] Answer: I kept notes. Question: Would it be correct to say that if they pertained to the scope of the Senate Resolution 229 that they have been delivered to the Committee? Answer: Yes. Question: And you have reviewed your notes yourself or along with your attorney? Answer: I have, So it isn't as if he didn't review his notes. He had reviewed them and admitted that and maybe that's the
August 4, 1994 - Part 10
(21:10:35) Senator MACK. Now, it's going to take a minute for me to go through these. This is something I've had to learn. You all have lived it, be somewhat patient with me as I attempt to get through this. September the 29th, there was a meeting- September 29th I guess a meeting between Ms. Hanson and Mr. Nussbaum. That is to give some information to Mr. Nussbaum about the 9 referrals. Mr. Nussbaum calls Mr. Sloan into that meeting and there is a continuation of a discussion about the referrals. As I understand it, Mr. Nussbaum then says to Mr. Sloan, that he should get in touch with you. Let me run through this and then I'll give you-believe me, you'll have an opportunity to respond. Mr. Sloan does contact you and he believes that that contact is either the same day or it could have been the day after. He then refers or provides you with the information about what had been 447 passed on to him by Ms. Hanson with respect to the referrals. And we have Mr. Sloan's notes of the conversation, of his conversation with Ms. Hanson about the referrals, Now I understand that there also was confusion over a memorandum. A memorandum that I think was dated October 7th, and that memorandum we believe basically underscores that you had in fact met with Mr. Eggleston and Mr. Sloan around the 29th of September. And my whole point in running through that, is that I'm under the impression that as of that October 1st or September 30th, that you've got information about the referrals. Now, we also know that you had made some notes of a conversation and during the deposition you had indicated, when you were reminded by this October 7th memorandum, that, yes, these notes corresponded to that meeting that took place either on the 30th or on the Ist. Now, also in the deposition, to be clear about it, I think you began to back away from that, saying that that was that first conversation. Then you got this phone call from Mr. Lyons when you were with the President on October 4th and I think you also testified that you men had a conversation with the President on that trip, October 4th or 5th. And I believe also that your testimony is something to the effect that, maybe if it hadn't been for Mr. Lyons calling so recently, maybe you wouldn't even have raised it with the President, but you in fact did mention the referrals to the President, on that trip. Now is that a pretty good Mr. LINDSEY. Close, but not quite. Let me go back. I think I testified in my deposition that I remembered having a short conversation with Cliff Sloan in which he informed me that there were referrals, that they expected or that there were leaks and that the Clintons were mentioned but not as targets or subjects. That is the only conversation I remember prior to my conversation with President Clinton. There are notes that Mr. Sloan has of a September 30 conversation he had with Jean Hanson, There are also notes of a October 7th conversation that Cliff Sloan had with Jean Hanson. There are notes that I have which are undated which say "conversation with Neil/Cliff." If you compare my one note with his two notes, it is apparent to me, and I believe to Mr. Sloan, (21:15:20)(tape #10095 ends)
Dog Heroes Receive Honor Medals For Outstanding Valor
High contrast, rolling images Neither size nor breed provide qualifications for standing in 'the dog legion' where bravery only counts. Twelve are decorated for fearless action in circumstance that they have meant death to masters. Mutts cavort with pedigreed caniners.
Native Patriots Hail First Official Visit Of Heir To Throne
High contrast, rolling images Native colonial troops tender a colorful reception to Prince Humbert, crown prince of italy on african journey with his bride, formerly Princess Maria Jose, of Belgium. Royal party is acclaimed by milling crowds eager for initial glimpse of their future ruler.
Police Begin Anti-Faulty-Brake-Drive!
High contrast, rolling images Police begin anti-faulty-brake drive drastic campaign against lax motorists brings quick results. Cars arrive in testing center; officials inspect the cars; sensational demonstrations [staged] of the perils of bad brakes, a car runs over a family changing a tire and a car careens off a cliff; SILENT
144 Cars stored in space for six! - novel device intended to relieve traffic and parking problems.
High contrast, rolling images 144 Cars stored in space for six! - novel device intended to relieve traffic and parking problems. A car turnstyle. It moves vertically like a giant food tray.
August 4, 1994 - Part 10
(19:45:35) Senator DODD. I don't disagree with that. I'm saying if you're ana question, you've been a witness, I've been a witness, and say let me look at my notes as I answer you, or in a trial you ,tauve the right to look at your notes to refresh your memory. So the fact that you have, you've been over them, the fact that you're re 426 sponding to a question and your lawyer says, guess, do your when we're now down to an important matter in this matter I like to rely on a guess, that's why I went over the distinction between a concluded claim and a protective claim. I appreciate you reading into the record because our witnesses do have an opportunity-we're on a tight schedule but nonetheless, they have a right to come back if they didn't like it and be deposed. The CHAIRMAN. Absolutely. Senator Shelby. Mr. ICKES. Mr. Chairman, I just want to make clear here. I think the statement read by the Senator is a little out of context. If you go to the preceding page, page 86 Senator DODD. Which Senator are you talking about now? Mr. ICKES. Senator Domenici. I think if you read the lead-in that, on line (19:46:38)(tape #10094 ends) 17, page 86. Question: Did anyone keep notes or records of the White House response group meetings? First, let me ask were official records of the White House Whitewater response team kept? Answer: No. Question: Was someone required to take notes? Answer: No, Then the following question. So I think the-the following aspect that was already read. So I think that the notes referred to on page 87 referred to notes that were taken in connection or not taken in connection with the Whitewater response team. In any event, the fact of the matter is I was not permitted by the Senate Counsel to review this one page of notes that I had taken during the--or in connection with the meeting on February 2nd. And those notes make very clear that one of the things that was being discussed, one of the alternatives was to commence litigation to preserve a claim. The CHAIRMAN. Let me just stop you there. Is it my understanding when you use the phrase protective suit-protective claim, you using that as another way of expressing point B on your notes, where it says "or, B, commence litigation to preserve claim"? Mr. ICKES. It is, Senator. It's just a different phrasing. The CHAIRMAN. I just wanted to understand your use of the word, and so even though it doesn't say protective claim here, and you've used that, you're using that interchangeably with the words on line B. Mr. ICKES. That's correct, Senator, The CHAIRMAN, Senator Shelby, Senator SHELBY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I know some of this has been gone over, and I tried to get into it, but I'm going to 90 into it one more time. Mr. Podesta, on the 24th-I believe it was the 24th of February when Mr. Altman testified at the oversight hearing of the Banking Committee, this Committee. You were at the White House that day, were you not? Mr. PODESTA. I was. Senator SHELBY. You did not come up to the Committee hearing. Mr. PODESTA. I did not, Senator SHELBY. Mr. Eggleston, as you well know, testified that he called you at the White House, He ran out of here, ran out of the room-I believe it was the other room but in this building, Dirksen Building, and he knew immediately, although he was seat- 427 ed near the back of the room, that something had gone wrong, in other words, that Mr. Altman was not forthcoming, was not candid and he called like an emergency call, and he said he called you. Do you recall the call? Mr. PODESTA. Senator, I don't believe I received that call. Senator SHELBY. Could it have been someone in your office? Mr. PODESTA. It could have been. Perhaps I could explain. I spent virtually the entire day in meetings with the FBI and later with some phone company representatives on some legislation that is now working its way through Congress to help update the Wiretap Act. I don't believe I was available to receive the call. He could have called my deputy, Mr. Stern. Senator SHELBY. Wasn't that call sort of like an SOS call? It was an emergency call there to the White House. Mr. PODESTA. I was not paged-I don't think-I wouldn't describe it that way. I did say, and I think in my testimony, that I think the next day, Mr. Eggleston was concerned about this, and he came and saw me. Senator SHELBY. What did he say to you? He came to see you Mr. PODESTA. He was concerned that the subject-in Mr. Altman's recounting of the meeting on February 2nd, the subject of recusal was not mentioned in his testimony on the 24th, and he was concerned about that. Senator SHELBY. Did he say that you all were going to have to control this some way? You're going to have to rehabilitate Mr. Altman's or supplement his testimony?
Bats in cave
short shot of bats in cave
Bats & stuffed bats
Bats & stuffed bats
Field Mouse
Field Mouse
Spider Web
Spider Web
Centipedes - in tall grass (2 copies of this)
Centipedes - in tall grass (2 copies of this)
S.A. River - Turtle
S.A. River - Turtle
Tarantula
Tarantula
Scorpion
Scorpion
Spider (big)
Spider (big)
Worms
Worms
Snails moving
Snails moving
Boy w/Scorpion on twig
Boy w/Scorpion on twig
Mice (brown rats)
Mice (brown rats)